Hi Italo,
When David wanted me to write the "Why" pages, my first reaction was that these
pages should be written by the marketing team. But he wanted to finish them, so
I did the job after studying how OOo positioned themselves.
Right from the beginning, I have repeatedly asked how LO is positioned, but
never got the reply.
How is a website copywriter supposed to write without that critical insight?
And now I am in the embarrassing position of having that article
revoked/reworked.
I do think your inputs should have come before I wrote those pages.
Why do SC-members have to reverse everything post-facto while remaining inert
when it counts?
I don't buy this "no time" concept. You wasted my time and effort through your
tardiness, and I don't like it.
****
My point to Mike was that the same points were already listed in the website,
and elaborated by David.
I didn't mean it was a great job; just that it was described in great (more)
details.
****
I also gave you a detailed feedback on the logo/tagline for the website.
I hope you will have the professional courtesy to reply that mail (remember it
is there on wiki too).
-Narayan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
