Hi, Le Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:11:22 -0400, drew <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:59 +0800, David Nelson wrote: > > Hi, :-) > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 21:07, drew <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi David > > > > > > You should of read the entire 'forums again' thread on the > > > discuss list and therefore you must of known that there are at > > > least three community members quite strongly opposed to at least > > > one of those links and that the question on the other two was not > > > settled. > > > > > Hi Tim > > > > > > > You want in that discussion, then get in it, but you do not have > > > cart blanch to arbitrarily act when the issue is obviously not > > > settled. > > > > > > Please remove those links, ASAP. > > > > I posted those links subsequent to Charles Schulz's comment on them > > (in this thread), and subsequent to again reading complaints > > recently about the lack of support forums > > If I may offer my opinion here on two slightly tangential subjects - > in an open discussion Charles Schulz of the Steering Committee is just > Charles Schulz. (sorry Charles, but think of it this way, at least I > didn't call you Chuck :-/ ) Oh, I agree. I'm of the opinion that, as my grand father used to say, on whatever seat one's sitting on he's always sitting on his own bum. :-) > > Also - You are filling a very visible position in the community at > present with the international website and you need to be very > cognizant of that. That really is the best advice I can give you. > > Ok back to the subject of the forum links - this thread? It is 2 > months old. While the subject on the discussion list has ~60 emails > over the last 9 days and really it is obvious that there are a couple > of different strongly held opinion groups, all of which seem to have > their backs up against the proverbial wall right now. > > I really don't think that any of the links are appropriate for today - > or at least not without taking on the issue directly, which means > engaging in the current discussion. On that I can offer this help - I > was wrong to disengage the other day and will be happy to get back to > it in a constructive way and let us see if there isn't a compromise > that everyone can live with - I think it may of been getting close. > > > > and the lack of prominence of the > > Nabble gateway. > > Different subject and frankly that was the one thing you probably > could of changed today and no one would of minded - I think. > > > > > If you would like forums added or removed, tell me specifically > > which and I'll be pleased to make the changes. > > IMO, and that is all it is at this point, the link to > LibreOfficeForum.org for sure should come down and please come with me > to the discuss list and let us see what happens, if you would. > +1 to all the above, Drew. -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
