On 11-02-2012 22:39, Cor Nouws wrote:
Anders Holbøll wrote (11-02-12 21:24)
I believe that 3.5.0 should be advertised as the default recommended
version. If it isn't ready for that, I would assume that the developers
had put out another release candidate!
I guess the developers think it's ready for the release.
We should ask them. Dev and QA are the ones that know what state the
code is in. Marketing are the ones that know that version number to use
publicly. So somehow it is an odd discussion here. But I don't know the
history and don't know what the project means by the version numbers. I
just know what I expect as an end user.
Thanks for your input on this. And the technical stuff in the other mail
too! (which I hope others will pick up.)
You are very welcome. Thank you for saying that.
In cane you have the 'one cures all' solution for our download page,
feel welcome to share :-)
No one have. But I think the suggestion I posted is as good as the other
mockups, which are much better than the current, and had the added
benefit of being usable now (listing of source packages is missing, and
translations and dynamic types should added). I thought about putting
version selection in the right column under "Handy resources", but
thought it was to noisy.
--
Anders
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
