On 11/02/12 23:46, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2012-02-11 16:56, Cor Nouws a écrit : >> Hi Olav, >> Olav Dahlum wrote (11-02-12 22:07) >> >>> Scaring, insulting, and driving away customers/users won't promote or >>> sell >>> LibreOffice. Instead, highlight the features in the various versions. >>> Meaning, market 3.5 for what it is; a faster generation etc etc, and >>> 3.4 as >>> something more of a LTS release. Corporate users love those messages. >>> Sell >>> like hell, sort of speaking … >> >> Would indeed be nice to have some wordings as 'long term' which means >> 'stable' to the reader. >> 'Thoroughly tested' as Italo wrote implicitly means that 3.5.0 would >> not be. Hmmm. >> Maybe just LTR, Long term release ? >> > I thought I read somewhere (on some mailing list) that the devs were > recommending using the term LTR only for the 3.5.x family later when it > is more stable. It was suggested not to use the term LTR for the 3.4.x > versions for some reason. So with this reasoning in mind, we would start > throwing around the "LTR" label for the 3.5.x version sometime after the > release of the 3.6.x version. > > Cheers, > > Marc >
Assuming adoption of LibreOffice will pick up pace due to usage on Android and iOS, this would be the right time to figure this out, and actually do it. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
