Hi Pawel,
Le 2013-02-04 10:10, Pawel Konefal a écrit :
Hi Marc, all,
I'm already PL NL maintainer. Few minutes ago I've finished translating
feature page. I don't want to talk about HTML code, because fixing this
requires complete CMS rework. You are doing great job. Feature page has
nice set of info.
I wonder, why we are using "Gb" (gigabit) instead of popular "GB"
(gigabyte)? I've noticed it on features and system requirements page. Bits
everywhere.
E.g. we are buying 512 Mb RAM memory or 512MB?
Shouldn't we use "MB"/"GB"?
And next thing, what about "msoreg" parameter, which was on system
requirements page? Does it still exists?
Greetings,
Paweł
====================
My apologies if I my message sounded like I was upset. I was not. I was
interested to see if you could make the Polish site's "4.0 Features"
page work better. We should all be helping each other and passing along
the information. There is no reason to wait for the EN version to lead
on projects; if the Polish team has a better way of building pages on
SilverStripe, then go ahead on your nl site and let us know how well it
works.
BTW ... Have you tested your 4.0 features page on Chrome? The cell
borders do not show. It would be nice if you could find the solution to
the problem with this. The table cell borders show fine in IE and FF but
not in Chrome.
If you can fix this problem on your "4.0 Features" page, it would be
nice to hear how you did this and we could all fix our pages. :-)
====================
Re "GB" or "Gb" ... if you find problems with some of the text, you
should be submitting a report on bugzilla and someone on this list will
fix it (them). This is how we normally fix the problems with text.
If it is with what particular term we should be using, then, we need to
coordinate with the docs team. Our terms should be the same they are
using in the EN docs.
But, yes, consistency is important.
====================
Re: "msoreg" could you also submit this as a bug report, it will need
more information? I am not sure what problem you are referring to.
====================
Re: reworking the whole site -- as far as I know, there has not been a
call for this at all. There is a FR team putting together a landing page
for the 4.0 release day and perhaps a couple more associated pages, but,
our regular libreoffice.org site will remain the same. There is no
"remake" of the site on the "to-do" list.
Re-doing the site would involve all of the communities with their
subsites, and, also be quite a big job. At this point, we are more
concerned with going from our present version of SilverStripe to the
newest stable version of SilverStripe. I think this is on Christian's
and Erich's to-do list.
Let me know if you need more information.
Cheers,
Marc
--
Marc Paré
[email protected]
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
