Hi, +1 for the option #2
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Florian Effenberger < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > given we still have load issues on our main web server (kermit), and all > approaches to fix it didn't work out in the end besides some little curing, > I propose we go for another server, as throwing hardware at the problem > seems to be part of the solution. > > We have two choices for that: > > (1) Moving the SQL server to kermit completely. > > (2) Moving only the Silverstripe instance for www.libreoffice.org and > native language projects to it. > > My preference currently is #2. Reasons: > > (a) When one of the servers has problems or goes down, it does not affect > all services. If a SQL or web machine is down, it affects all services, > even if the counterpart is still running. > > (b) With the web site relaunch project, we need a testbed and second > instance to "pull the plug" when it's ready anyways, and IMHO it makes > sense to have the whole package on a dedicated machine. > > (c) Internal connectivity at our ISP is between 200 Mbit/s to 1 Gbit/s. I > am not sure if the sheer amount of SQL data we need in parallel fits that. > > Thoughts? > > Florian > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
