I strongly advocate against it; it would only create more confusion and continue into the storyline that fresh=unstable and stable=good.
No one puts an older software branch in front of the more recent branch. Does MS Office advertise MS Office 2010? :-) Best, Charles. On 21 avril 2014 22:56:07 CEST, Robinson Tryon <[email protected]> wrote: >Hiya, > >During discussion on the QA call today, the topic of the download page >came up. We link to the 'Fresh' page from the front-page of >libreoffice.org, and while we do provide a link from the Fresh page to >the Stable version, said link is pretty small. > >Thoughts on making the link to the Stable version more prominent? (We >generally promote the Fresh version more heavily, but I do have many >users ask me about the Stable version) > >Thanks, >--R > >-- >Robinson Tryon >LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald >Senior QA Bug Wrangler >The Document Foundation >[email protected] > >-- >To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] >Problems? >http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: >http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be >deleted -- Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
