Le 20-04-23 à 02 h 31, Ilmari Lauhakangas a écrit : > Emiliano Vavassori kirjoitti 22.4.2020 klo 23.45: >> Hi Ilmari, >> >> Il 22/04/20 20:18, Ilmari Lauhakangas ha scritto: >>> What's up with the wild world of conference calls? Let's have a look at >>> the past, present and future of TDF's Jitsi. >> >> Thanks for the recap and the overview for the next future. >> >> I still support the idea that Jitsi will help us so much in making >> public meetings with 20+ people. I'm looking forward for the next >> iterations, to see if implementations done by Infra team has the >> expected impact on the user experience. Nonetheless, I see this is too >> much bound to client settings to be "stable" by itself. >> >> Calling Firefox out of the games from the start seems harsh, though. We >> can state that due to implementation issues with the regards of Firefox, >> you may use it if in version >77 or with simulcast disabled (we should >> provide docs to disable it, at least a link). Plus we should briefly >> clarify that, if indications are not followed, esp. on the FF side, it >> would thrash others' experience. >> >> For sure, we should give much stricter/clearer indications on how to >> join the meeting for the sake of the quality perceived by all of the >> participants. Maybe building a wiki page (to be pointed out when calling >> public meetings) on how to access the Jitsi instance with these caveats >> (and the other ones pointed out before by Cloph) may quicken and ease it >> usage, making it also a public point. Ideally, showing it before joining >> the room would increase also its effectiveness (at least the first >> time). > > I wrote the recap at this time, because it seems to me that the > problems with browser diversity are essentially solved. Simulcast for > stable Firefox is disabled in the up-to-date Jitsi Meet we use and > even though it was supposed to relate to video, it seems to coincide > with having no problems anymore in an audio-only call. I will continue > to join various meetings with stable Firefox to see, if people have a > degraded experience. > > I don't see a need to create documentation for this or mention it: > even if Firefox 75 would continue to cause problems, we only have a > bit over 1 month to 77. On the contrary, we can stop warning about > browser diversity. > > I focused on Firefox, but Safari support is being improved as well. > > Ilmari > Just as a side-note to this, some Linux distributions are using (as in my case with Mageia Linux) Firefox v.68.70esr. I am not sure if the Firefox devs will be patching their LTS versions so that these not cause any issues. Do you know if this has also been considered?
Marc -- Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com https://www.parEntreprise.com parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
