On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 14:46:51 +0200, Dennis Roczek wrote: > As the software itself is rotten old: we should start evaluating to use > some new software as a drop-in replacement. > > Any ideas for such a similar software?
Which feature do you have in mind here? * Posting from the web: I think Nabble's way of it is terrible: 1/ it's 3rd party so we don't know how they validate accounts etc. 2/ they use the user's address as envelope sender and From: header but use their own SMTP client so it breaks SPF and other strict DMARC alignment checks one would normally want to do on a mailing list where there is potential of spamming thousands of users at once (and damage the reputation of our MTA). FTW I count 33 queued messages (not necessarily ML posts, might also include subscription requests etc.) from 13 different senders from Nabble in the past month. In contrast we've archived over 1700 posts. * Full text search, cleaner archive looks: we can easily tweak the template to allow for that. I actually started working on that week in preparation for the FDO migration. * Feed: dunno if that's easily doable. We could also bridge the mailing lists with Discourse or whatever Q&A / discussion platform we adopt, though having two authoritative sources for posts sounds kind of wrong to me. -- Guilhem. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
