On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Todd Zullinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hiemanshu Sharma wrote: >> I have always been a +1 to this idea. Also do you want to split the >> repo into one repo for each spin or one repo for all the spins. One >> spin into each repo is better so that you dont have to give everyone >> access to other repos and avoids confusion. > > Separate repos per-spin seems like the way to go to me too (though I > don't do any work on the spins and haven't done much for the main > website lately either, so take that for what it's worth). > > -- > Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Everything the government touches turns to crap. > -- Ringo Starr
I think we should just put all the spins in a single repo. Putting each spin into a separate issue will create unnecessary complexity with little/minimal benefit. One of my bigger concerns doing it this way would be around consistency in theming and branding. This is also not mentioning the translation problem of translators looking in a lot of places to translate things and likely translating the same text over 8-10 repos. Sijis -- websites mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
