On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, inode0 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Ankur Sinha <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 08:08 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote: > >> > Just a little reminder, Fedora was around BEFORE Facebook. If there is > >> > anyone who should change their logo, it's Facebook, not us. > >> > >> I definitely agree with that. > > > > +1 > > > > I see no reason at all to change our logo. It's perfect the way it is. > > If it is confused with other logos from a similar product space then > it isn't perfect. It may well be no fault of the logo but it is a > problem. > > > If someone thought it was a Facebook plug-in.. well... > > If a lot of someones think it is related to Facebook then it is a > problem worth thinking about before it gets completely out of control. > We have seen other hints that this confusion exists in the past as > well. > > Admitting we have a brand problem which seems to be related to some > similar aspects that exist in our logo and in Facebook's logo doesn't > mean we need to abandon our logo. Are there other ways available to us > to mitigate this confusion? Perhaps advertising Fedora more widely so > more people are exposed to our brand more often? Perhaps something > else? >
it would be great if we could identify the region/location of those people. but there is no such information i guess. I think we should increase our presence in the social media specially in Facebook itself. > > John > -- > websites mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites > -- Danishka Navin http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/danishkanavin http://www.flickr.com/photos/danishkanavin/
-- websites mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
