2016-04-28 3:10 GMT+02:00 Dan Haskell <[email protected]>: > Downloaded iso of the server edition. Tried to verify following > instructions and failed. First your key is not certified. > > > gpg --verify-files Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM > gpg: Signature made Fri 30 Oct 2015 01:31:05 PM PDT using RSA key ID > 34EC9CBA > gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (23) <[email protected]>" > [unknown] > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: EF45 5106 80FB 0232 6B04 5AFB 3247 4CF8 34EC 9CBA > > Second, it appears to be the wrong key(?) > > > ls > Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso > > > sha256sum -c Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM > Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso: OK > sha256sum: Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: No such file or directory > Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: FAILED open or read > sha256sum: WARNING: 20 lines are improperly formatted > sha256sum: WARNING: 1 listed file could not be read > > > Couldn't you just provide a md5sum instead? The gpg stuff is cool and all, > but when it fails... give us something to work with. Clicked on support, > but it's just a link to a BUNCH of forums. Not helpful. > > Dan > > > -- > websites mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
You have a good signature, so the ISO id ok. The rest only says the key doesn't have a certified signature, AFAIK we will try to include some text message in the future to give users a better resume, but won't provide md5sum. Regards. -- Robert Mayr (robyduck)
-- websites mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
