Jyri Virkki wrote: > > A technicality: See > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/interface-taxonomy/ > "Obsolete" is now considered a modifier, so your interfaces which were > "Uncommitted" become "Obsolete Uncommitted" and so forth. >
I thought as much, I've seen it used both ways but I guess the way I've done it isn't really correct. I'll change it. > The case seems fine to me otherwise. > > It'd be nice to also document in the case itself what the new > replacement for each of the obsoleted commands will be. Personally I > won't require the case to cover that (the user docs will certainly > have to cover it though, but you already mention that in s.2.4), it'd > just be nice. Maybe someone else might feel differently. > > As in a years time it might be something completely different, I'll document what we are planning on using in the upgrade and mention that this may change during the obsolescence period. Thanks for taking the time to review this. Amanda
