Jyri Virkki wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: >> Based on your description that there is no architectural issue with >> providing the probes on SPARC just a build environment issue. >> >> Given what you described the way I would recommend that this case is >> changed to provide the functionality on both platforms. The project >> teams asks that due to the issue described that delivery on x86 be >> allowed before delivery on SPARC - this is really more of a C-Team issue >> but it helps to have had the ARC review. > > That is indeed what the project team is committing to - equal features > on both platforms, with the understanding that putbacks for them will > not occur on the same date (SPARC follows at a later date). That's how > they managed to convince me it's an automatic case.
It isn't what many of us read the case as saying though. -- Darren J Moffat
