Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi Siva,
>  Looks fine.
>  -ps
>
>
> Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
>   
>> Oops. Sorry. Forgot my coffee this morning.
>>
>> The webrev is at
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~ss39446/dtrace-ruby2/
>>     

Siva, during the ARC case reviews we decided to leave dtrace.h in but 
not mention it as an public interface correct? 
So, dtrace.h should be a part of this patch.

Thanks,
 -ps


>> Apologies again.
>>
>> Siva
>>
>> Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Hmm. Posted this from the Forum itself. I was thinking it will quote the 
>>> previous replies.
>>>
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~ss39446/webrev2/webrev/
>>>
>>> Apologies for the inconvenience. Please review again. Thanks
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Siva
>>>
>>> Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Requesting a review of this webrev again, as I had split the webrevs 
>>>> to handle the two CRs separately. The new changes for this webrev is 
>>>> to handle CR 6632022 alone and man page changes. Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Siva
>>>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> webstack-discuss mailing list
>>>> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>>>>       
>>>>         
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>> webstack-discuss mailing list
>> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> webstack-discuss mailing list
> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>   


Reply via email to