jean jayet wrote: > Sriram Natarajan wrote: > >> HI >> You are welcome to try out PHP 5.2.6 from our webstack repository and >> give us your valuable feedback >> >> From your OpenSolaris 2008.05, >> >> 1. remove the existing apache/php glue, If in case, you have already >> installed amp packages on your system >> >> pfexec pkg uninstall SUNWapch22m-php5 -> remove the 5.2.4 version of >> apache / php glue package >> > > just to clarify : > > you are removing this SUNWapch22m-php5 as it does not exist anymore with > php 5.2.6 but is replaced with SUNWapch22m-php52 ? correct ? > > but why changing the name ? in case user want to maintain 2 different > php releases machines ? > > The change in package name is captured in the ARC draft that I sent out earlier. This is done as part of the package and file layout changes that is happening with the upcoming php 5.2.6 integration so as to allow a smoother PHP 5.3 integration happen in the very near future (even within 2008.11 if possible).
Currently, PHP 5.2.4 is provided within SUNWapch22m-php5. Though, PHP 5.2.6 is backward compatible with the currently integrated PHP 5.2.4, upcoming PHP 5.3 is not totally backward compatible. So, we need to include version information within this glue package so as to allow a smoother integration of PHP 5.3 glue package without causing confusion. > Jean > >> 2. If you have not install any Apache / MySQL packages package, now >> would be a good time >> pfexec pkg install SUNWapch22 SUNWmysql5 >> >> 3. and enable the SMF services by doing some thing like >> pfexec /usr/sbin/svccfg import >> /var/svc/manifest/network/http-apache22.xml >> pfexec /usr/sbin/svccfg import >> /var/svc/manifest/application/database/mysql.xml >> >> pfexec /usr/sbin/svcadm enable http:apache22 >> pfexec /usr/sbin/svcadm enable mysql:version_50 >> >> 4. finally , download php 5.2.6 binaries from web stack repository by >> doing some thing like >> pfexec pkg set-authority -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/webstack webstack >> >> pfexec pkg refresh >> >> pfexec pkg install pkg://webstack/php526-devtest >> >> >> With these, you should be able to get your php applications working out >> of the box. >> Hope this helps >> sriram >> >> Sriram Natarajan wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> Thanks for all the feedback . I have an updated ARC draft to integrate >>> PHP 5.2.6 within OpenSolaris (Not much has changed except to include >>> PHP SNMP as a separate package - why separate package - mainly because >>> of its dependencies..) >>> >>> http://wikis.sun.com/download/attachments/10390064/php-526-arc-draft-v2.txt >>> >>> I am hoping to get these integrated in time for build 97 . Your >>> earliest response on this will be much appreciated. >>> >>> Jyri - Will you kindly consider sponsoring this case within ARC ? >>> >>> thanks >>> sriram >>> >>> >>> >>> Glynn Foster wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 12/07/2008, at 10:51 AM, Peter Tribble wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> One can argue that it is nice to distribute each individual >>>>>> extension in a >>>>>> separate package (there by reducing the dependency on core runtime >>>>>> package) >>>>>> but it introduces a huge maintenance headache for both customers as >>>>>> well as >>>>>> developers to ensure that every extension that a developer wants is >>>>>> installed on the production system. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> As an administrator, one of the biggest headaches is packages with >>>>> unnecessary >>>>> dependencies bringing those unnecessary dependencies onto a system. >>>>> >>>>> Do developers want this? I've never been asked to install the snmp >>>>> extension on >>>>> any of my servers running php, and can't really see a typical >>>>> developer system >>>>> having any need for it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I think I'd agree with Peter here, but obviously from a user >>>> experience point of view, you'd at least want to be able to download a >>>> core set of common extensions that most people use in a convenient >>>> way. Maybe there's an opportunity to make that judgement for the user, >>>> package all the other extensions separately, and as feedback comes in, >>>> re-assess that core package. >>>> >>>> >>>> Glynn >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> >>>> webstack-discuss mailing list >>>> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> webstack-discuss mailing list >>> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> webstack-discuss mailing list >> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > > > webstack-discuss mailing list > webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >
