chris zhu wrote:
> Siva,
>
> Because a lot of rdoc files are add to SUNWruby18u and SUNWruby18r, and 
> all the entries are sorted by name according to  David's suggestion, so 
> I also changed the format of permission.
>   


Chris, aren't there ri entries for DTracer in prototype_com?  I remember 
the original conflict between the Ruby "Tracer" and the DTrace "Tracer" 
happened in usr/ruby/1.8/share/ri/1.8/system/

So I was expecting to see some "DTrace" directories in the prototype_com 
in SUNWruby18u as well . . .
 -ps


> Regards
> Chris
>
> Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
>   
>> Chris,
>>
>> The changes look good.
>> One point though.
>> The differences (example, of SUNWruby18r/prototype_com) is because of 
>> the entries being only slightly different.
>> 0644 in the original and 644 in the new version. This causes a huge 
>> difference file. This could be avoided.
>>
>> Siva
>>
>>
>> Chris Zhu wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It's a review for CR6650926 again, as these are some conflict between 
>>> the change(enable rdoc), and the last ruby putback for dtrace probe, 
>>> we'd like to go through the process again.
>>> The problem is shown as some rdoc files are missed for prototype_com 
>>> of SUNWruby18u, which are supposed to be generated automatically in 
>>> building.
>>> And it is caused by the dtrace probe integration, which has been put 
>>> back to the nv87(CR6632022). It add a new module "Tracer" to ruby 
>>> which will conflict with the default ruby script file tracer.rb which 
>>> defined "Tracer" as a top level class. So we should change the module 
>>> name of dtrace to avoid the problem.
>>>  
>>> New changes are listed here
>>> 1) We changed the module name from "Tracer" to "DTrace" to avoid the 
>>> conflict with build-in top-level class "Tracer". see 
>>> *ruby-dtrace-1.8.6.patch*
>>> 2) Rdoc files for new module and methods of "DTrace" are add to 
>>> package SUNWruby18u. Because it's only for x86 now, so 2 entries are 
>>> added to *prototype_i386.tmpl
>>>
>>> *New webrev is updated here 
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~chriszhu/CR6650926-webrev/
>>>
>>> And here are the old review for CR6650926: 
>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=211095&#211095
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks & regards
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
>>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>>>       
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>   


-- 
Prashant Srinivasan
F/OSS Enthusiast
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://blogs.sun.com/prashant
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x82FBDE5A


Reply via email to