Matt Ingenthron wrote:
>
> Toward that end, it's worth thinking about what kind of functionality we 
> need to "pkg install ruby_rails_lighttpd" or "pkg install amp" or even 
> "pkg install webstack".  The other big question in my mind here is how 
> we'd handle post-install configuration (if at all).

My position is that such meta packages should be aligned with
functional needs of end users, not on organizational boundaries of
engineering teams working on components (which are irrelevant to users).

Stated that way it's probably noncontroversial ;-)

(But then, "pkg install webstack" doesn't meet that criteria.)

-- 
Jyri J. Virkki - jyri.virkki at sun.com - Sun Microsystems

Reply via email to