Jyri Virkki wrote: > I think this discussion finds no good closure with Apache because it > is in a grey area. Its minor releases are farther apart and mostly > compatible, but still binary incompatible in some ways. > That's what makes this (provision for multiple versions) a tougher call. Given that there are no guarantees for binary compatibilities between minor versions and given some 3rd party plugins probably need to stay with the earlier versions, I still prefer we make the provision for multiple versions of Apache. After all, it's consistent with other parts of the stack (e.g. PHP).
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discuss... Sriram Natarajan
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Matt Ingenthron
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Sriram Natarajan
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Sriram Natarajan
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Jyri Virkki
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Sriram Natarajan
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Jyri Virkki
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Jyri Virkki
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache dis... Murthy Chintalapati
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so f... Basant Kukreja
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions... Sriram Natarajan
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so f... Mads Toftum
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions... Seema Alevoor
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions... Sriram Natarajan
- [webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discuss... Mads Toftum
