> Just to clarify, we have been discussing whether to permit minor releases to > coexist and not whether *revisions* of minor releases will coexist. i.e. we > won't have /usr/apache2/2.2.4, /usr/apache2/2.2.6 etc.
I agree that it seems unlikely that we would have multiple minor revisions but the proposed directory format shouldn't preclude that, right? I thought the proposal on the table was similar to what we have for Perl where the subdirectories are specified by their complete version number such as /usr/apache2/2.2.6 and not /usr/apache2/2.2.x. Or did I misunderstand what you're saying? dsc
