Prashant Srinivasan wrote: > > Why "ruby" in the directory name, as opposed to Ruby-On-Rails, or RoR?
ruby seems appropriate for ruby ;-) But more to the point, Rails is a separate unit, ruby exists independently of it. One can certainly be a ruby user without ever using RoR. I'd imagine you should deliver a ruby package and a separate RoR rails package (which depends on ruby). -- Jyri J. Virkki - jyri.virkki at sun.com - Sun Microsystems
