ludo wrote: > Sriram Natarajan wrote: > >>> I am reading http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0605/819-2887.pdf >>> and my hope is such setting (very complex imo for a simple person >>> like me) would be handy for the Developer using SXDE... >>> >>> >> The above blue print is very comprehensive. Upcoming Apache 2.2.6 >> integration does handle some of the issues that is covered in the >> above blue print. >> >>> Let me know if this is the right direction. >>> Basically, a new Solaris role would be created ('webstack' as a role >>> name?) that would be added to the solaris user. >>> This role would allow to >>> stop, start apache, mysql (possibly postgres), view/changes log files >>> or config files or Dbs, etc... >>> >>> I see some predefined groups in Solaris (postgres, >>> webservd,mysql,...) Should we use them instead or use this new >>> 'webstack' role to represent a typically WebStack AMP developer? >>> >>> >>> >> IMO, adding another role is not very much helpful. I would expect >> that a site administrator would not prefer to give start / stop access >> of databases to any web developer. We need to simply leverage the >> existing roles / privleges that currently exist for Apache, MySQL and >> PostgreSQL >> > > So far, in B76 and private mysql installation, I do not see these > roles/privileges defined for Apache and MySQL... > > Who will define then and when? > > When MySQL is integrated into Solaris, then this particular user (mysql) should be added as part of integration. With respect to apache, one should be associating this component with 'webservd' user that has been specifically created for this purpose.
thanks sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20071030/e5292f50/attachment.html>
