Sriram, unless there is a business reason to keep MySQL 4.x then I would personally think that we should remove it from Nevada.
As for Solaris 10 -- yes we should keep it there -- I just tried to answer Stefan's question. Lukas Sriram Natarajan wrote: > Lukas > Yes, we should continue to retain MySQL 4.x for Solaris 10. But, my > question is should we keep it around in Nevada ? > > - sriram > > Lukas Rovensky wrote: >> Stefan Teleman wrote: >> >>> On Thursday 08 November 2007 13:30, Brandorr wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I will not comment on SIP, but I would humbly suggest that MySQL >>>> versions remain supported until such time that MySQL AB officially >>>> "retires" them. (As they have done for 4.0 and 3.23: >>>> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/choosing-version.html) >>>> >>>> I think it would be a reasonable policy to end of life/support a >>>> particular release when MySQL AB actually . >>>> >>> I am unaware that the MySQL 4 delivered as a dependency for SER was >>> ever "supported". >>> >>> >> Look at the following link: >> >> http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/freeware/ >> >> MySQL 4 is supported through the "managed" support model for S10 but >> mainly because of SER. >> >> >>> Supported by whom ? >>> >>> >> By Solaris sustaining team. >> >> Lukas >> _______________________________________________ >> webstack-discuss mailing list >> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >>
