Jyri I have made few more changes to the draft. You can catch the latest version from here http://wikis.sun.com/download/attachments/10390064/php_more_features-update-2.txt
In the updated ARC draft, the following changes have been made - Incorporate some of your feedback - Deliver pear / mysql and pgsql extensions as separate packages. This is to address the concerns from the Web Stack community. pl. see inline for the rest Jyri Virkki wrote: > Sriram Natarajan wrote: > >>> The text in this section doesn't make a very clear distinction between >>> the two CLIs being delivered, for which purpose is each one used. I >>> suggest adding a few sentences to that effect. >>> >> >> please take a look at the updated draft and let me know if the >> explanation provided within addresses your concern. >> > > The 'pecl' CLI detail looks good, but I didn't see explanation about > 'pear' yet, add something about it. I also see you added a new > 'peardev' CLI, so also add a little info about its usage as well. > > All these CLIs will deliver man pages right? Also add a sentence > saying so to the same section. > > - On further poking around, I see no reason to bundle 'peardev'. I have removed it. - There will be no man page for 'pear' / 'pecl' command. Hence, it is not mentioned in the draft. >>> So downloaded packages will be installed into this location? >>> >> >> you could use /etc/php5/pear.conf to specify where you want to download >> these extensions. >> > > I know, I meant default location. It wouldn't hurt to mention the > location can be changed in the config, if you want. > > Yes, I have added a few lines to mention this. >> 2.6 Integration with Apache >> >> To provide closer integration of with Apache, provide php >> specific configuration file(php.conf) under '/etc/apache/2.2/conf.d' >> directory. This file will be delivered within SUNWapch2r-php5 package. >> > > Since it is tied to Apache 2.2 (delivering into /etc/apache/2.2/) > shouldn't this be named SUNWapch22r-php5, to parallel the Apache > package naming (SUNWapch22[dru])? > > Thanks for catching it. I believe that these package names should be consistent with the Apache modules ARC draft that is being considered. What do you think ? Can we go with the current package name (SUNWapch22m-php5) or should we need to change it ? thanks sriram
