I would be happy either way. It was originally done so that ant steps, e.g. echo could happily live inside if that was how the script was being debugged - but I don't even know if that works as originally intended at the moment - the test just ensures that it is ignored (not executed and ignored).
Cheers, Paul. Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi, working on the new way to generate report, I've seen that <expectDialogs/> just logs a warning when a nested step is not a dialog step and ignores it. What does it bring? Shouldn't the test break as it is an incorrect test comparable with invalid parameters? This would make my migration easier. Marc. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/expectDialogs-too-lenient--t1785324.html#a4862376 Sent from the WebTest forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
