Hi Marc,
For the expandProperties() and verifyParameters(), i don't
really know if they are required. I just copy the
executeStep() method in BaseStepTestCase. But if you think i
can remove them, it will be done.
I just have to define the specific Resource Bundle for the GUI
and it will be ok, but it's a JMeter problems.
> Hi Eric,
>
> this sounds good.
>
> Why do you need expandProperties() and verifyParameters()?
Can you show
> a code snippet using your verififiers?
>
> expandProperties will disappear after release 2.1 as we will
use better
> ant. #{} properties will be expanded before the values are
set on the
> steps what will allow the step properties to have the type
they should
> have (ie boolean, int, String, ... and not just String).
>
> Marc.
>
>
> eric.frigot wrote:
> >> Hi Eric,
> >>
> >> if you're successful, don't hesitate to post your results
> > back. The
> >> verifiers have never been meant for this purpose but if you
> > see that
> >> small adaptations would facilitate reuse without burden for
> > WebTest, let
> >> met know.
> >
> > Well, first results are interresting. For the CheckBox
> > verifier, I do something like that in the getResult method of
> > a class extending AbstractTestElement (in JMeter) :
> >
> > // Setting response
> > ContextStub context = new
> > ContextStub(inResponse.getResponseData(),
> > inResponse.getContentType());
> >
> > // Initializing Verifier
> > VerifyCheckbox step = new VerifyCheckbox();
> > // ... set here parameters
> >
> > // Executing verification
> > try {
> > StepExecutor.executeStep(step);
> > }
> > catch (StepFailedException sfe) {
> > result.setFailure(true);
> > result.setFailureMessage(sfe.getMessage());
> > }
> > catch (Exception e) {
> > result.setFailure(true);
> > result.setFailureMessage(e.getMessage());
> > }
> >
> > Where result is a JMeter object and StepExecutor :
> >
> > package com.canoo.webtest.steps;
> >
> > public class StepExecutor {
> > public static void executeStep(final Step step) throws
> > Exception {
> > step.expandProperties();
> > step.verifyParameters();
> > step.doExecute();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > The only way to access expandProperties and verifyParameters
> > is to make such class (in a canoo package).
> >
> > Is there another way to do that well ?
> >
> > As you see, using Canoo WebTest verifiers in JMeter is not
> > difficult. I am making GUI components and implementing all
> > verifiers.
> >
> >> Another idea would be to "export" from WebTest to jMeter
> > format (perhaps
> >> with a module "listening" to the execution of a test and
> > generating a
> >> JMeter file more intelligently than a proxy).
> >
> > The reason why i choose to make such plugin come from Calypso
> > GUI which does not seem to record behind a proxy.
> >
> > I don't think it is possible to export from WebTest to JMeter
> > because JMeter cannot accees HTML Form with their names or id.
> >
> >> Marc.
> >>
> >> eric.frigot wrote:
> >>> The solution is simple : just use the ContextStub Class
which
> >>> can take a string representation of an HTML Page and do all
> >>> the necessary initialisations.
> >>>
> >>> If this plugin is usefull, i will post a feedback here
and on
> >>> JMeter.
> >>>
> >>>> Hi there,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am working on load tests and unit test. JMeter seems
to be
> >>>> enough good for the load tests and Canoo WebTest has
> >>>> interesting verifiers.
> >>>>
> >>>> As I want to simplify testing process, I am trying to
> > only use
> >>>> JMeter. But it does not define verifiers like WebTest does.
> >>>>
> >>>> It does not seam very difficult to develop a JMeter
> > Plugin. So
> >>>> I look in WebTest source code to see possible use of its
> >>>> verifiers. I am not sure that I can easily use them outside
> >>>> WebTest.
> >>>>
> >>>> The Context class contains the html pages, but which
> >>>> attributes must be set to use the verifiers?
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone try to do something like that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> WebTest mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
> >>>>
> >>> Cet été, pensez aux cartes postales de laposte.net !
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> WebTest mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> WebTest mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
> >>
> >
> > Cet été, pensez aux cartes postales de laposte.net !
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WebTest mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>
Cet été, pensez aux cartes postales de laposte.net !
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
