Hi Peter,
I don't have any experience in Maven 2 plugin development and just can
tell about WebTest.
WebTest IS Ant. I mean that WebTest "scripts" ARE Ant build files, that
WebTest steps ARE Ant tasks, that WebTest (now) uses Ant's mechanism for
property expansion or record generation. As a consequence it is not
possible to use WebTest without Ant.
Nevertheless I can't say how it fits the best with Maven 2, it's your
and Ejaz's job ;-)
Marc.
Peter Anning wrote:
Hi All,
Ejaz has made available some code that wraps webtest as a Maven 2 Ant
Plugin. Whilst I am very grateful to Ejaz for his code I had expected it
to be a native Maven 2 Java Plugin. All the Maven Plugins that I have
written have been in Java. So my question is does anybody have any
opinions; ant or java?
Java would involve plugging into the webtest api behind the Ant layer.
Is this a good or bad thing to do or is webtest bound tightly to Ant. I
guess if it is bound tightly to Ant Ejaz's Maven Ant plugin may be the
way to go. If it has been designed to be loosely coupled then maybe I
should look at writing Java version.
Best Regards
Peter Anning
Sr. Developer
www.dialectsolutions.com
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
