Thats correct that most projects do that. Perhaps should we too. Does someone see problems with that?
Marc. Michael Habbert wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > yes, root-directory, I didn't catch the right term for it. It has no > root-directory. I would expect > something like a root-directory: webtest-2.x or without a release-number. > > Michael > > Marc Guillemot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just downloaded build.zip again and it comes correctly with a >> directory >> structure. Isn't it a setting problem in your zip tool? >> >> Or do you mean that it should have a root directory with all subdirs and >> files in it? >> >> Marc. >> >> >> Michael Habbert wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> is there a reason for the design of the build.zip-file? I mean without a >>> directory-sturctur. Each >>> time when I unzip the build.zip I do have my actual directory wasted >>> with >>> the components of the >>> build.zip and not created a new i.e. webtest-2.2 directory. >>> >>> I suggest to change the build.zip-file to contain a directory. >>> >>> thanks >>> Michael Habbert >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WebTest mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest >>> >>> >> > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Michael Habbert > _______________________________________________ > WebTest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/directory-design-of-the-build.zip-tf3432512.html#a9576505 Sent from the WebTest mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
