Marc Guillemot wrote:
do you mean the bugs of foreign libs that required to patch them?
Yes, I guess we can still use Jira - but at least document
what patches we are hoping will be integrated into 3rd party
libs down the track. Unfortunately, pdfbox has many bugs and
only very slow progress to fixing them even when patches are
supplied. But I don't know of anything to replace it with yet.
JPedal would be good but it is GPL which is effectively useless
for us.
Paul.
Paul King wrote:
Last time I checked we needed the patches still - but I haven't
checked for a few weeks. I'll try to find some time soon. We really
should track the bug numbers as part of the WebTest doco.
Paul.
Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi Siegfried,
Paul needed the patched pdfbox and fontbox. I don't know what the current
status is and if we could now remove them.
Concerning a release: on one side I still have many things in my todo
list
that I'd like to implement for a new release (like <dragAndDrop.../>,
report
split, current page state visible in reports, ...). On the other side
last
release is already 4 months old and many things have been added /
improved,
so why not.
Marc.
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi Marc,
A "labelled" build without patched pdfbox and fontbox available in the
Maven repos.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi Siegfried,
what is a "clean release"? ;-)
A "labelled" build or just a build without patched pdfbox and fontbox?
Marc.
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi Denis,
any chance to get a clean release any time soon?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi Denis,
> I don't have such plan. I have a plan to upload a version of
webtest,
> once it has sensible dependencies, meaning no dependencies on
special
> versions, or patched versions, of third parties jar.
go for it .... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Denis N. Antonioli wrote:
Hi Siegfried
On 5 juil. 07, at 18:08, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi Denis,
currently I have manually imported all custom jars and the
webtest.jar into my local repo. But if someone else would use the
plugin he/she would have to do the same hops which is not the
intention of a maven plugin.
I understand and I agree with you.
So the question remains if you have any plans to officially upload
the Webtest 2.5 release plus all custom libraries to Maven Central?
I don't have such plan. I have a plan to upload a version of
webtest,
once it has sensible dependencies, meaning no dependencies on
special
versions, or patched versions, of third parties jar.
Of course, this plan can be changed, as the circumstances change.
Best
dna
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Denis N. Antonioli wrote:
Hi Siegfried
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
are you talking about
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/canoo/webtest/
No, I'm only talking of:
<http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/netbeans/jemmy/>
The change to webtest's pom went only to the normal webtest
distribution.
It happened in build 1580.
Best
dna
It only contains older versions of webtest an no patched jars ...
:-(
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi folks,
I finally wrote a M2 plugin for Canoo WebTest and will start
using
it next week. Afterwards it will go to Codehaus ....
For a broader testing the various custom jars need to be
uploaded
to a M2 repo:
+) fontbox-0.1.0-dev-patched-20060622.jar
+) jemmy-20040604.jar
+) pdfbox-0.7.3-dev-log4j-20060612.jar
+) pdfunit-1.2-dev-20060623.jar
+) poi-2.5.1-patched-20060410.jar
+) webtest-1551.jar
Anyone willing to do that or should I base the plugin on a newer
release?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
