I should have added that the proposal is to just have an extra attribute
on the Group step (all for now?) which would appear in the normal way
in the reports. Then the XSL would be modified to change the appearance
of the report if it found the extra attribute was there - so it should
not require any change to the reporting format and should be backwards
compatible if you have the old xsl - you just won't see the 'prettier'
DLS words in use.
Paul.
Paul King wrote:
I have a customer that would like to add some convention or extra
attribute for reporting of groups. They would like something like:
<group description="..." reportAs="login">
...
</group>
It is actually used within our DSLs in Groovy:
def login(...) {
ant.group(description:'...', reportAs:'login') {
...
}
}
The 'reportAs' or 'label' or 'info' attribute would appear in the
report in bold instead of the current step name of 'group'.
This would allow our DSLs to end up more naturally reflected
in the reports.
Does this sound like it would be of general interest?
Cheers, Paul.
P.S. we could also explore whether we could make macrodef's
or other steps/tasks be able to make use of such a feature.
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
