Just like I always said: as soon as we allow something like ifStep the demands will push us into implementing a programming language in XML syntax.
I would very much like to avoid that. Dierk > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul King > Sent: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 14:16 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Webtest] possible extension to ifStep > > > > One of my customers has asked for an enhancement to <ifStep> > At the moment, if the ifStep condition is met, the nested > steps within the ifStep are executed. > > The extension would add a <then> group and an <else> "group" > as nested steps for the ifStep. If either <then> or <else> > appears as nested steps, no other direct nested steps are > allowed (they would need to be contained within the appropriate > then or else "group". At most one <then> and one <else> is allowed. > The <else> group would be executed if the condition fails. > > Existing usage would still be supported as is, i.e.: > > <ifStep if="...">...</ifStep> > > <ifStep unless="...">...</ifStep> > > <ifStep> > <condition>...</condition> > ... > </ifStep> > > New usage would look like: > > <ifStep> > <condition>...</condition> > <then>...</then> > <else>...</else> > </ifStep> > > Is this of general interest of should I just create this for this > customer as a customised extension? > > Thanks, Paul. > _______________________________________________ > WebTest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
