Hi,
the mailing list is fully correct.
In Grails you can just extract common step sequences in utility methods like
// Utility.groovy
class Utility
{
doLogin(ant)
{
ant.group(description: 'perform login')
{
invoke "http://...";
}
}
}
// SomeTest.groovy
import static Utility.*
...
webtest('some test')
{
doLogin(ant)
...
}
(my mailer still doesn't compile, syntax error are possible ;-))
When you're utility methods are located directly in your class (or in
some parent class), you don't need to pass ant as parameter.
Cheers,
Marc.
--
Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have Grails running with Canoo Webtest plugin installed. Life is great
> except my tests feel very repetitive. When I used Canoo Webtests
> stand-alone, I used a lot of in-line parsing with the entity and put
> common tests in areas available to all. I know a lot of work was going
> on in the background to make those pieces available. Is there a similar
> process for the plugin for Grails? Is there a different way to include
> common tests?
>
> This may not the best forum to address the question, if it's not please
> let me know. There's not a whole lot of information that discusses this
> that i could find. I would love to be proven wrong - especially if you
> have the documentation available :)
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
