Paul, thank you.
I was hoping that someone had already walked that path. If I have to spend too much time on getting it to work, it is probably a better business decision to just continue with the VB approach. There is another quote to add. "If theory and fact disagree, so much for the facts!" I will try to get something here but not disturb the community since my allowed time to work on this will be minimal since there was not a previous answer. Again, thanks, George -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul King Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Webtest] VisualBasic and Webtest George Policello wrote: > I realize that VisualBasic (VB) is not a BSF scripting language but we > have a large volume of VB Test scripts. The QA folks do not want to > adopt Webtest if it requires rewriting those tests. > > > > It occurred to me that someone in the community might have developed an > Ant task or taskdef that would run the VisualBasic tests. > > > > Also, I have an idea that I could use Groovy to run the VisualBasic > indirectly. > > > > If you have a way to do this, sharing it would be appreciated. In theory, you could write a DSL in Groovy that understood your VB tests but I am reminded of a quote: "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." or the other variation I have seen: "The difference between theory and practice in theory is much less than the difference between theory and practice in practice." Perhaps you could post one simple test (or part thereof) and we might be able to comment further on whether we think that path is viable. Cheers, Paul. _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
