This worked perfectly for what i was doing on the XML side - now I need to
adapt this to Grails - if anyone has used the Webtest plugin for grails,
can someone determine the grammar for adding the option to the
configuration in Groovy? Grails plugin keeps the resources in a different
area and uses different naming structure.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/23/2008 08:51 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
RE: [Webtest] VerifyLinks
Thank you! I've never used the setting before but will make use of it
today :)
"Conor MacMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/22/2008 07:39 PM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [Webtest] VerifyLinks
Hi David,
I had a similar problem late last week, some JavaScript files
where changed on a public website I use verifyLinks on, but whose content
I do not control. I got around the JavaScript error, by disabling the
JavaScript validation via the config setting (i.e. note the
ThrowExceptionOnScriptError option set to false):
<config host="${host}" port="${port}" protocol="http"
basepath="${webapp.name}" resultpath="${resultPath}"
saveresponse="true"
resultfile="web-tests-result.xml" summary="true">
<header name="Accept-Language" value="${user.language}"/>
<option name="ThrowExceptionOnScriptError" value="false" />
</config>
This may be too drastic for you, in that you may want to see JavaScript
errors. However, it's good to know this can be a solution to you, if you
don't get another from someone else.
HTH,
Conor
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2008 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Webtest] VerifyLinks
I have a site that I am testing with the following:
<verifyLinks depth="11" onsiteonly="true" excludes=".*js.*"/>
I want to test 11 levels deep and ignore any javascripts files. I'm still
receiving errors for the following:
http://127.0.0.1:8080/js/prototype/dragdrop.js#600
I thought it would skip over this file since i didn't want it looked
after.
Also, does anyone have good examples of using reportLinks and ReportSite?
Not quite sure the difference between the 2 except that reportSite appears
to work if you provide the sub element and reportLinks just seems to
short-circuit to true.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This email (including any attached files) is for the intended
recipient(s) only. If you received this email by mistake, please,
as a courtesy, tell the sender, then delete this email.
The views and opinions are the originator's and do not necessarily
reflect those of the Queensland Studies Authority. All reasonable
precautions have been taken to ensure that this email contained no
viruses at the time it was sent.
