anwers inside:

--- Marc Guillemot <[email protected]> schrieb am Di, 17.2.2009:
> in this mailing list???
nope, a personal one. ping him after not getting the registration mail for 2 
hours.

> > My problem is: currently those 3 jars are being
> repacked to the webtest-maven-plugin and codehaus folks will
> _not_ be very happy with that!
> 
> 3 jars?
> There is no dependency against non released artifacts
> anymore.

The webtest-maven-plugin currently has the following jars in it's lib directory:
.) fontbox-0.1.0-dev-patched-20060622.jar  
.) pdfbox-0.7.3-dev-log4j-20060612.jar  
.) webtest-1720.jar

can you point me to a current webtest jar so I can remove the other 2?
As I explained earlier: Although I use canoo, I'm not that deep into it like 
Sigi. I'm only helping out a bit on the maven side because Sigi has not much 
time currently.

> > So what about doing a webtest-3.0-RC1 _now_ (this week
> at least)? So we at least have a preliminary version in the
> repo.
> > Maybe there are known bugs, but having this officially
> released will draw much attention and it can be used much
> more easily.
> 
> I thought about that but it make first sense when there is
> really a
> Maven plugin available.

I think the cat is biting in her tail here - not sure if this saying translates 
well into english :)

I can release (and even add it to SVN) only after I have a canoo webtest.jar 
somewhere in an official repo which I can reference as dependency. Because I 
don't like to add all thos 3-rd party jars to the apache SVN.
So after you published the jar to the public repo, I can push the 
webtest-maven-plugin to codehaus.mojo as an 'official' maven plugin. I took all 
the sources from Sigi and prepared them rdy for checkin.


> > In the meantime, the latest version of the
> webtest-maven-plugin can be downloaded from my git
> http://ns1.backwork.net via
> > 
> > $> git clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/webtest-
> > maven-plugin.git
> > 
> > I don't like to upload this to the codehaus SVN
> with those 3 jars :(
> > That's the only thing which hinders us from an
> 'official' maven release.
> 
> It seems to me that a maven plugin should make usage of
> webtest.xml and
> from what I can see, this is not the case here. I can
> imagine that it
> has been written at a time where webtest.xml didn't
> exist. I believe
> that it would be better to start a new plugin from scratch
> to use
> webtest.xml correctly and to handle webtest tests written
> in Groovy.
What about 'old' projects? I e.g. have a lot of canoo-ant code lying around 
which has to be supported also.

In either case, we have to get an initial version into SVN and then a lot of 
people can contribute easily.

There is an old english saying: How to climb a mountain? Step after Step!

So my suggestion is:
1.) publish a webtest-3.0.RC1.jar
2.) I will checkin the current webtest-maven-plugin
3.) we may then work together on getting it up to date.

WDYT?

txs and LieGrue,
strub



_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest

Reply via email to