Heyo.

I see from WT-253 that the issue around namespaces in XPath 
verification has been closed.  I cannot figure out how to make it work.

In a relatively simple XML document with a default namespace 
(xmlns="http://www.example.com/"; on the root element, "response"), none 
of the following work:

<verifyXpath xpath="/response/getCurrentUser/name" value="name" />

(error: no node matched)
(this is expected; it shouldn't match)

<verifyXpath xmlns:ex="http://www.example.com/"; 
xpath="/response/getCurrentUser/name" value="name" />

(error: prefix must be declared)

Similarly if the namespace declaration is promoted to the containing 
"webtest" element and beyond.

This thread: 
http://lists.canoo.com/pipermail/webtest/2006q4/007358.html (from 2006) 
points at other threads that suggest solving things with a small groovy 
script.  The pointed-at script is no longer correct (null pointer), but 
a little patience leads one to 
step.context.getXPathHelper().registerGlobalNamespace("ex", 
"http://www.example.com/";), which also yields: prefix must be declared.

And yet the issue was closed, for 2.5.  I can't find any examples of 
how to do it "right", though.  Anyone have a pointer?

It would be nice to have <namespace prefix="ex" 
uri="http://www.example.com/"; /> as child elements of "config", but I 
don't see any indication that it might be so straightforward.  I might 
have to patch it to do that (that way the namespaces would be defined 
in a reasonably predictable location, and valid for all the documents 
processed within the containing webtest element, presumably), but I 
thought that I should ask first, and see if someone can point me at an 
existing solution.

Oh, I'm using the 3.0 distribution, rather than the nightly.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis                    amyzing {at} talsever.org
According to Business Week, in the 1990s the ratio between a chief
executive's salary and the takehome pay of the typical, feckless, 
whining grunt on the shopfloor rose from 85:1 to 475:1. (In the UK, 
which is seeing a vigorous popular backlash against "fat cat" pay 
packets, the ratio is 24:1).
               -- The Register
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest

Reply via email to