Hi,
WebtestCase's webtest method first calls the config method before to
execute the closure, therefore something like that would work (ok,
having to explicitly get ant reference is not so beautiful ;-))
what about this
void config()
{
ant.config(browser: 'FF3')
}
Cheers,
Marc.
--
Web: http://www.efficient-webtesting.com
Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com
manuel aldana wrote:
> manuel aldana wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> throughout my test methods the config settings are repeating and I
>> would like to put it to the setUp() method (see sample code). put then
>> the inner webtest closure context is lost and the config setting won't
>> work.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> void setUp(){
>> config(....){...}
>> }
>>
>> void test1(){
>> webtest(...){....}
>> }
>>
>> void test2(){
>> webtest(...){....}
>> }
>> -----------------------------------
>>
>> how is it possible to extract the config-settings inside a setup
>> logic? Looking at the code itself I think it is not possible because
>> the webtest() context is unknown inside setUp().
>>
>>
> I found a little workaround, which is still forcing a config setting in
> each test method, but at least duplicates less stuff.
>
> -----------------------------------
> def config={webtestContext ->
> webtestContext.config(...){...}
> }
>
> void test1(){
> webtest(...){config(delegate);....}
> }
>
> void test2(){
> webtest(...){config(delegate);....}
> }
> -----------------------------------
>
>
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
