Bill Ayers | What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been
Friday 07 November 2008

»

by: Bill Ayers, In These Times


Upon the end of a surreal campaign season, Bill Ayers speaks out. (Photo: Chris 
Walker / The Chicago Tribune) 

    Bill Ayers looks back on a surreal campaign season.

    Whew! What was all that mess? I'm still in a daze, sorting it all out, 
decompressing.

    Pass the Vitamin C.

    For the past few years, I have gone about my business, hanging out with my 
kids and, now, my grandchildren, taking care of our elders (they moved in as 
the kids moved out), going to work, teaching and writing. And every day, I 
participate in the never-ending effort to build a powerful and irresistible 
movement for peace and social justice.

    In years past, I would now and then - often unpredictably - appear in the 
newspapers or on TV, sometimes with a reference to Fugitive Days, my 2001 
memoir of the exhilarating and difficult years of resistance against the 
American war in Vietnam. It was a time when the world was in flames, revolution 
was in the air, and the serial assassinations of black leaders disrupted our 
utopian dreams.

    These media episodes of fleeting notoriety always led to some extravagant 
and fantastic assertions about what I did, what I might have said and what I 
probably believe now.

    It was always a bit surreal. Then came this political season.

    During the primary, the blogosphere was full of chatter about my 
relationship with President-elect Barack Obama. We had served together on the 
board of the Woods Foundation and knew one another as neighbors in Chicago's 
Hyde Park. In 1996, at a coffee gathering that my wife, Bernardine Dohrn, and I 
held for him, I made a $200 donation to his campaign for the Illinois State 
Senate.

    Obama's political rivals and enemies thought they saw an opportunity to 
deepen a dishonest perception that he is somehow un-American, alien, linked to 
radical ideas, a closet terrorist who sympathizes with extremism - and they 
pounced.

    Sen. Hillary Clinton's (D-N.Y.) campaign provided the script, which 
included guilt by association, demonization of people Obama knew (or might have 
known), creepy questions about his background and dark hints about hidden 
secrets yet to be uncovered.

    On March 13, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), apparently in an attempt to 
reassure the base,- sat down for an interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News. 
McCain was not yet aware of the narrative Hannity had been spinning for months, 
and so Hannity filled him in: Ayers is an unrepentant "terrorist," he 
explained, "On 9/11, of all days, he had an article where he bragged about 
bombing our Pentagon, bombing the Capitol and bombing New York City police 
headquarters. ... He said, 'I regret not doing more.'"

    McCain couldn't believe it.

    Neither could I.

    On the campaign trail, McCain immediately got on message. I became a prop, 
a cartoon character created to be pummeled.

    When Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin got hold of it, the attack went viral. At a 
now-famous Oct. 4 rally, she said Obama was Ïpallin' around with terrorists.- 
(I pictured us sharing a milkshake with two straws.)

    The crowd began chanting, "Kill him!" "Kill him"- It was downhill from 
there.

    My voicemail filled up with hate messages. They were mostly from men, all 
venting and sweating and breathing heavily. A few threats: "Watch out!" and 
"You deserve to be shot." And some e-mails, like this one I got from [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]: "I'm coming to get you and when I do, I'll water-board you."

    The police lieutenant who came to copy down those threats deadpanned that 
he hoped the guy who was going to shoot me got there before the guy who was 
going to water-board me, since it would be most foul to be tortured and then 
shot. (We have been pals ever since he was first assigned to investigate 
threats made against me in 1987, after I was hired as an assistant professor at 
the University of Illinois at Chicago.)

    The good news was that every time McCain or Palin mentioned my name, they 
lost a point or two in the polls. The cartoon invented to hurt Obama was now 
poking holes in the rapidly sinking McCain-Palin ship.

    That '60s Show

    On Aug. 28, Stephen Colbert, the faux right-wing commentator from Comedy 
Central who channels Bill O'Reilly on steroids, observed:

    To this day, when our country holds a presidential election, we judge the 
candidates through the lens of the 1960s. ... We all know Obama is cozy with 
William Ayers a '60s radical who planted a bomb in the capital building and 
then later went on to even more heinous crimes by becoming a college professor. 
... Let us keep fighting the culture wars of our grandparents. The '60s are a 
political gift that keeps on giving.

    It was inevitable. McCain would bet the house on a dishonest and largely 
discredited vision of the '60s, which was the defining decade for him He built 
his political career on being a prisoner of war in Vietnam.

    The '60s - as myth and symbol - is much abused: the downfall of 
civilization in one account, a time of defeat and humiliation in a second, and 
a perfect moment of righteous opposition, peace and love in a third.

    The idea that the 2008 election may be the last time in American political 
life that the '60s plays any role whatsoever is a mixed blessing. On the one 
hand, let's get over the nostalgia and move on. On the other, the lessons we 
might have learned from the black freedom movement and from the resistance 
against the Vietnam War have never been learned. To achieve this would require 
that we face history fully and honestly, something this nation has never done.

    The war in Vietnam was an illegal invasion and occupation, much of it 
conducted as a war of terror against the civilian population. The U.S. military 
killed millions of Vietnamese in air raids - like the one conducted by McCain - 
and entire areas of the country were designated free-fire zones, where American 
pilots indiscriminately dropped surplus ordinance - an immoral enterprise by 
any measure.

    What Is Really Important

    McCain and Palin - or as our late friend Studs Terkel put it, "Joe McCarthy 
in drag" - would like to bury the '60s. The '60s, after all, was a time of 
rejecting obedience and conformity in favor of initiative and courage. The '60s 
pushed us to a deeper appreciation of the humanity of every human being. And 
that is the threat it poses to the right wing, hence the attacks and all the 
guilt by association.

    McCain and Palin demanded to "know the full extent" of the Obama-Ayers 
"relationship" so that they can know if Obama, as Palin put it, "is telling the 
truth to the American people or not."

    This is just plain stupid.

    Obama has continually been asked to defend something that ought to be at 
democracy's heart: the importance of talking to as many people as possible in 
this complicated and wildly diverse society, of listening with the possibility 
of learning something new, and of speaking with the possibility of persuading 
or influencing others.

    The McCain-Palin attacks not only involved guilt by association, they also 
assumed that one must apply a political litmus test to begin a conversation.

    On Oct. 4, Palin described her supporters as those who "see America as the 
greatest force for good in this world" and as a "beacon of light and hope for 
others who seek freedom and democracy." But Obama, she said, "Is not a man who 
sees America as you see it and how I see America." In other words, there are 
"real" Americans - and then there are the rest of us

    In a robust and sophisticated democracy, political leaders - and all of us 
- ought to seek ways to talk with many people who hold dissenting, or even 
radical, ideas. Lacking that simple and yet essential capacity to question 
authority, we might still be burning witches and enslaving our fellow human 
beings today.

    Maybe we could welcome our current situation - torn by another illegal war, 
as it was in the '60s - as an opportunity to search for the new.

    Perhaps we might think of ourselves not as passive consumers of politics 
but as fully mobilized political actors. Perhaps we might think of our various 
efforts now, as we did then, as more than a single campaign, but rather as our 
movement-in-the-making.

    We might find hope in the growth of opposition to war and occupation 
worldwide. Or we might be inspired by the growing movements for reparations and 
prison abolition, or the rising immigrant rights movement and the stirrings of 
working people everywhere, or by gay and lesbian and transgender people 
courageously pressing for full recognition.

    Yet hope - my hope, our hope - resides in a simple self-evident truth: the 
future is unknown, and it is also entirely unknowable.

    History is always in the making. It's up to us. It is up to me and to you. 
Nothing is predetermined. That makes our moment on this earth both hopeful and 
all the more urgent - we must find ways to become real actors, to become 
authentic subjects in our own history.

    We may not be able to will a movement into being, but neither can we sit 
idly for a movement to spring full-grown, as from the head of Zeus.

    We have to agitate for democracy and egalitarianism, press harder for human 
rights, learn to build a new society through our self-transformations and our 
limited everyday struggles.

    At the turn of the last century, Eugene Debs, the great Socialist Party 
leader from Terre Haute, Ind., told a group of workers in Chicago, "If I could 
lead you into the Promised Land, I would not do it, because someone else would 
come along and lead you out."

    In this time of new beginnings and rising expectations, it is even more 
urgent that we figure out how to become the people we have been waiting to be.

   http://www.truthout.org/110708R?print

    Bill Ayers is a Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University 
Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He is the author of "Fugitive 
Days" (Beacon) and co-author, with Bernardine Dohrn, of "Race Course: Against 
White Supremacy


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"WebTV Dawgs/Dittos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/WebTV-Pals
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to