http://www.populist.com 
EDITORIAL
Obama¹s Fast Start 
When John F. Kennedy was elected president in 1960, I was 6 years old,
so his election didn¹t mean as much to me as it did for my parents.
For them, JFK¹s election legitimized Irish Catholics in American
society, more than a century after our ancestors had immigrated to the
United States. 
                Before JFK, many
Catholics felt they had something to prove, particularly in Northwest
Iowa, where Irish Catholic was about as ³ethnic² as you got in the
1950s and ¹60s. Since JFK, we haven¹t sent any more Catholics to the
White House, but that¹s because we have better things to do (mainly
fighting amongst ourselves). 
                Now, whatever else
happens, a clear 
majority of voters in the United States have put their trust in a black
man to lead us into what appears to be the roughest economic patch since
the Great Depression. It isn¹t the end of racism, as some Republicans
have suggested, but from here on African-American parents won¹t be
jiving their kids when they tell them they can grow up to be president.
Regardless of whatever else Barack Obama accomplishes in the next four
years, he has raised aspirations. 
                And if Obama should win
a second term, 
kids who are in the fourth grade this year will graduate from high
school thinking there is nothing unusual about having a president who is
black. 
                Of course, we¹re a
long way from Obama¹s second term‹although a wag at ThePoorMan.net
noted that Obama already has been sworn in twice. But the 44th president
got a fast start on his first term, issuing executive orders trying to
undo much of the mess left by his predecessor during the closing days of
the Bush regime, and working to gain approval for his economic recovery
plan. 
                During his first 100
hours in office, 
Obama ordered a freeze on new regulations at all government agencies. He
also reinstated the Freedom of Information Act after years of Bush
administration obstruction and denial of requests for public documents.
Obama ordered all agencies to ³adopt a presumption in favor² of FOIA
requests. Former presidents such as George W. Bush should find it harder
to block release of their old secrets. That not only should help
journalists and public-interest watchdog groups; it also could clear the
way for congressional investigators seeking memos detailing White House
involvement in the US Attorney firings in 2006, the leaking of CIA
operative Valerie Plame¹s name and discussions relating to the
decision to invade Iraq. 
                Obama also instructed US
military leaders to start planning a withdrawal from Iraq, ordered the
prison at Guantanamo Bay closed within one year and suspended all
military tribunals for six months. He ordered an end to torture and the
CIA¹s secret prisons and he appointed high-level emissaries to sort
things out in Israel-Palestine and Pakistan-Afghanistan. 
                Obama laid out strict
lobbying limits, 
banning White House aides from trying to influence the administration
when they leave his staff and banning gifts from lobbyists to anyone in
the administration. He also overturned the Global Gag Rule, which
prohibited US aid from going toward any organization that mentioned
abortion as an option in family planning. That lets 16 countries regain
access to birth control support. 
                In the spirit of
bipartisanship, Obama 
sought Republican support for his $825 billion economic recovery
package. He included $300 billion in tax breaks to appeal to the diehard
supply-siders. His reward on Jan. 27, after three meetings with GOP
leaders, was the pronouncement by House Republican Leader John Boehner
that GOP House members would oppose the stimulus. They complained that
House Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) has larded the bill
with items such as $90 billion in aid to states for Medicaid, $30
billion to subsidize health insurance for people who lose their jobs,
$20 billion to accelerate new health care information technology and $1
billion to renovate community health centers. The GOP disparaged $15.6
billion to increase college Pell Grants, $6 billion to extend broadband
Internet access to rural areas and $4 billion to help communities buy
and improve distressed properties. Funding for other worthy public
works, such as mass transit projects, lost out to the tax cuts, but
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Democrats were
³drifting away² from Obama¹s preference for a stimulus that
includes 40% tax cuts. 
                So Republicans will
struggle against the current. They probably won¹t support a stimulus
package that is weighted toward creating 3.7 million jobs over the next
two years. The GOP will let the Democrats do the heavy lifting and
they¹ll disregard any good that comes from it. If the stimulus works,
they¹ll say it would have worked better if they had provided more tax
cuts for the rich. If it doesn¹t work, they¹ll say ³We told you
so!² 
                Obama is not naive. He
wants to pass 
bills with as broad a consensus as he can manage, but he talked about
his negotiating style in November 2007, telling the Keene, N.H.,
Sentinel he¹s open to compromise but won¹t let people take advantage
of him. ³I give people the benefit of the doubt and try to understand
their point of view,² he said. ³If I perceive that they¹re trying
to take advantage of that, then I¹ll crush them.² 
                The GOP instinct is to
follow the 
reasoning of Rush Limbaugh, who admitted on his radio show that he hopes
Obama fails. Obama is giving Republicans the chance to be part of the
solution. If Republicans try to obstruct his program, Obama has clear
majorities in the House and Senate. Dems will have 59 votes in the
Senate when Landslide Al Franken (DFL-Minn.) finally claims his seat
after former Sen. Norm Coleman exhausts his appeals. Republicans can try
a filibuster, with no votes to spare, but then it will be clear who is
trying to sabotage the recovery. 
                Citizens can strengthen
Obama¹s hand by 
keeping pressure on Congress members to support the economic stimulus
and push for more 
progressive initiatives to follow. The citizen¹s job doesn¹t stop
with the election. House Republicans in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan
are particularly vulnerable to persuasion. ³Their constituents want
them to take action to save the economy, not block progress,² a White
House aide told Politico.com. 
                As more people lose
their jobs, and the 
rest of us wonder how secure our jobs are, the time is ripe for Congress
to expand Medicare to cover all Americans. People who lose jobs may
assume health insurance costs paid by their former employers, under
federal law, or they can shop for insurance for themselves and their
family. But unemployment benefits won¹t cover private health insurance
as well as the rent, utilities, groceries and other bills. Medicaid
provides health coverage to low-income families, but as local economies
deteriorate more states will have trouble coming up with their share of
the costs. Republicans cite emergency rooms as the safety net for the
unemployed, but that leaves charity hospitals or local governments to
pick up the unpaid bills. 
                Obama plans to move
toward universal 
coverage by encouraging businesses to provide health insurance and
helping individuals buy insurance for their families, either through
private companies or a government pool. It would be simpler for
businesses and individuals if the federal government expanded Medicare
to cover everybody. The vast majority of businesses and individuals
would pay less for health coverage under this single-payer plan, which
could be financed with a payroll tax of 7% on employers and an income
tax of 2% on individuals, 
Physicians for a National Health Program (pnhp.org) notes. 
                The National Nurses
Organizing
Committee/California Nurses Association 
(Calnurses.org) figures that Medicare for All would create 2.6 million
jobs‹slightly more than the number of jobs lost in 2008‹and
health-care jobs would not easily be shipped overseas. Rep. John Conyers
(D-Mich.) has reintroduced HR 676 in the 111th Congress. Supporters hope
to get 150 cosponsors by the end of February in order to get the bill
included in the health care reform discussion. Last year it had 93
co-sponsors. 
                For more information,
and to see if your House member is a co-sponsor, see 
(populist.com/healthcare.html).   ‹ JMC


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"WebTV Dawgs/Dittos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/WebTV-Pals
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to