I agree 8-)

subana wrote:
here's another argument for legalization..........the government would be able to regulate how it's produced and refined.  And just think of the taxes!!  Here, cigarettes and alcohol are the first thing that gets taxed........just imagine if the govt could also tax marijuana!!
 
It seems to me, that it would bring in a lot of revenue.........
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:17 PM
Subject: {Dawgs/Dittos} Re: Michael Phelps

It's BUD, is one reason, during the 60's there was mostly leaf going around.
 
Plus, most of the weed now isn't cured properly. IMPO
 
Some, if not most people now like it as 'fresh' as possible.
 
To each their own, I suppose.


From: Bill aka LeFantome <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 7:54:09 PM
Subject: {Dawgs/Dittos} Re: Michael Phelps

weed today is not the weed of the 60's. One gal give me some and it was awful. I nearly choaked.





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WebTV Dawgs/Dittos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/WebTV-Pals
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to