Limbaugh at 5EST.....C-Span
+++++++++++

CPAC, Limbaugh, and other horror stories from the crypt
P.M. Carpenter 
THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

One of the many pleasant aftereffects of ultraconservatism*s crackup is
the retirement of a civic need for appalled spectators to demonize its
out-patient disciples -- or whacko-ize them, if you will -- because
they*re doing such a marvelous job of it all by themselves.

I mean, what additional diagnosis or prognosis is required when, for
instance, the far right gathers with such convenient tidiness at events
like CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference, and puts on
pitiable display not only a wholesale absence of serious public policy,
but a virtual 24/7 unraveling of whatever slim dignity it once strove to
possess. 

When even goddess-of-the-right Sarah Palin declines an appearance -- she
suspects her old pals now have the cooties, I guess, plus she*s too busy
cramming for her 2012 finals, uncomprehendingly digesting copious past
issues of Foreign Policy and Time for Kids -- then one knows the heavy
black curtains are being lugubriously drawn.

"Man, this CPAC thing is crazy," observed Mr. Samuel Wurzelbacher,
a.k.a. Joe the Plumber, to fellow attendee Mike Huckabee -- and that*s
probably the sanest thing we*ll ever hear Sam/Joe utter. With concise
but tragically fleeting lucidity, he captured the moment, the spirit,
the zeitgeisty degeneration of his semi-philosophical compadres. 

Sam/Joe Wurzelbacher/Plumber was, as the Politico reported, "a headliner
at a Thursday panel titled *Conservatism 2.0.* " A headliner, mind you:
an itinerant, breathtakingly clueless bullshitter was a CPAC-Chosen One
to enlighten the multitudes on the fundamentals of conservatism.
Breathtaking indeed.

Also on Thursday there were book signings by the still-unnetted Ann
Coulter -- just the name chills for itself -- and the vastly
disingenuous David Horowitz. (I once heard David say in an interview
that college professors lead a carefree, easy life of leisure with
phenomenal pay; oh, they give occasional lectures, but that*s pretty
much the burden of their existence. 

A few months later, in another interview that touched on why there are
so few female professors in the sciences, I heard him say it*s because
women don*t care to suffer the grueling schedules and demands of a
college professorship. This is a man who makes his living by deriding
the intellectual honesty of higher-education sorts.)
So that was Thursday but today, of course, is Saturday, which brings us
-- or, rather, just them, thankfully -- to CPAC*s bookended finale of
... Rush Limbaugh, scheduled to bellow and bray at 5:00pm EST, then --
get this -- receive at 5:30 the "Defender of the Constitution Award."
(America*s Constitution?)

Just now I ventured over to rushlimbaugh.com to take an intrepid peek at
how this deep Conscience of Conservatism might be previewing his
upcoming performance. Here*s what I found, here*s what is on Rush*s Web
site, here*s what is weighing on the profound mind of Mr. Limbaugh in
these profoundest of deeply troubled times:

You know, Clint Eastwood had it right, Clint Eastwood said he*s fed up
with political correctness. He*s fed up with everybody trying to be
politically correct. He*s fed up with nobody being able to laugh
anymore. He*s fed up with not being able to tell race jokes and ethnic
jokes. When he was growing up, everybody did. Nobody took offense at it.
Every race tells jokes about the other race. Every country tells jokes
about people in other countries. We can*t do it anymore.

I gather, however, that Rush will this evening. But pause just a moment
and consider what topic -- from all the topics available to choose from
in these, as noted, horrifically troubled times -- Mr. Limbaugh chose
with which to preview his speech: race jokes. 

That kind of says it all, doesn*t it? It pinpoints and broadcasts just
how utterly adrift and altogether irrelevant movement conservatism has
become. 

But don*t take my word for it, commie-pinko unAmerican rabble-rouser
that I surely am in the seething, delirious, Rush-possessed eyes of the
far right. You might, however, try on for size, say, John Derbyshire, a
National Review contributing editor writing this (suspiciously) for The
American Conservative:

Why have we allowed carny barkers to run away with the Right?...
Did the Limbaughs, Hannitys, Savages, and Ingrahams lead us to this
sorry state of affairs? They surely did. At the very least, by yoking
themselves to the clueless George W. Bush and his free-spending
administration, they helped create the great debt bubble that has now
burst so spectacularly....

In place of the permanent things, we get Happy Meal conservatism: cheap,
childish, familiar. Gone are the internal tensions, the
thought-provoking paradoxes, the ideological uneasiness that marked the
early Right. 

But however much this dumbing down has damaged the conservative brand,
it appeals to millions of Americans....
If conservatism is to have a future ... it will need to listen to more
than the looped tape of lowbrow talk radio. 

As spotlighted this evening before the huddled, fawning and lowbrow
masses of CPAC. 

A Mr. Derbyshire I can respect, I can debate, I can even empathize with,
in many a Burkean way. A Mr. Limbaugh I can only laugh at -- and marvel
at the irrelevantly silly depths to which he and his fellow carny
barkers have dragged modern conservatism. *Tis a pity, because modern
liberalism needs a worthy opponent if it*s to maintain its own mental
health. 

More:
http://buzzflash.com/articles/carpenter/324


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"WebTV Dawgs/Dittos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/WebTV-Pals
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to