true, republicans think by saying 'socialist' that people will also think 
that means 'soviet' or 'communist'!!

Actually, I don't have a negative reaction when someone says 
'socialist'......it actually sounds like a good idea to me!!

hmmm........maybe we should ask Gov Palin?  Since her state is actually the 
closest to a socialist state.......

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:11 PM
Subject: {Dawgs/Dittos} Republicans and the "socialism" word




A couple of thoughts....
First, most people do not remember Roosevelt's stimulus or Lenin
socialism and do not know about it even; so using those examples is lost
on them....and we had Facism for eight years so some Social investment
sounds fine...!!
+++++++++++++

by: Harold Meyerson original @ The Washington Post

 Conservatives are currently attacking President Barack Obama by calling
him a socialist.
"We are all socialists now," proclaims Newsweek. We are
creating "socialist republics" in the United States, says Mike Huckabee,
adding, on reflection, that "Lenin and Stalin would love this stuff." We
are witnessing the Obama-era phenomenon of "European socialism
transplanted to Washington," says Newt Gingrich.

Well! Even as we all turn red, I've still encountered just
two avowed democratic socialists in my daily rounds through the nation's
capital: Vermont's Sen. Bernie Sanders . . . and the guy I see in the
mirror when I shave. Bernie is quite capable of speaking for himself, so
what follows is a report on the state of actual existing socialism from
the other half of the D.C. Senators and Columnists Soviet.
First, as we survey the political landscape, what's striking
is the absence of advocates of socialism, at least as the term was
understood by those who carried that banner during the capitalist crisis
of the 1930s. Then, socialists and communists both spoke of
nationalizing all major industries and abolishing private markets and
the wage system. Today, it's impossible to find a left-leaning party
anywhere that has such demands or entertains such fantasies. (Not even
Hugo Chávez - more an authoritarian populist than any kind of
socialist - says such things.)

Within the confines of socialist history, this means that
the perspective of Eduard Bernstein - the fin de siecle German socialist
who argued that the immediate struggle to humanize capitalism through
the instruments of democratic government was everything, and that the
goal of supplanting capitalism altogether was meaningless - has
definitively prevailed.

Within the confines of American history, this means that when New York's
garment unions left the Socialist Party to endorse Franklin Roosevelt in
1936, they were charting the paradigmatic course for American
socialists: into the Democratic Party to support not the abolition of
capitalism but its regulation and democratization, and the creation of
some areas of public life where the market does not rule.

But in the United States, conservatives have never bashed
socialism because its specter was actually stalking America.

Rather, they've wielded the cudgel against such progressive reforms as
free universal education, the minimum wage or tighter financial
regulations. Their signal success is to have kept the United States free
from the taint of universal health care. The result: We have the world's
highest health-care costs, borne by businesses and employees that cannot
afford them; nearly 50 million Americans have no coverage; infant
mortality rates are higher than those in 41 nations - but at least
(phew!) we don't have socialized medicine.

Give conservatives credit for their consistency: They
attacked Roosevelt as a socialist as they are now attacking Obama, when
in fact Obama, like Roosevelt before him, is engaged not in creating
socialism but in rebooting a crashed capitalist system. The spending in
Obama's stimulus plan isn't a socialist takeover. It's the only way to
inject money into a system in which private-sector investment,
consumption and exports - the other three possible engines of growth -
are locked down. Investing more tax dollars in education and research
and development is a way to use public funds to create a more
competitive private sector. Keeping our banks from speculating madly
with our money is a way to keep banking alive.

If Obama realizes his agenda, what emerges will be a more
social, sustainable, competitive capitalism. His more intellectually
honest and sentient conservative critics don't accuse him of Leninism
but of making our form of capitalism more like Europe's. In fact, over
the past quarter-century, Europe's capitalism became less regulated and
more like ours, one reason Europe is tanking along with everyone else.

Take it from a democratic socialist: Laissez-faire American
capitalism is about to be supplanted not by socialism but by a more
regulated, viable capitalism. And the reason isn't that the woods are
full of secret socialists who are only now outing themselves.

Judging by the failures of the great Wall Street investment
houses and the worldwide crisis of commercial banks; the collapse of
East Asian, German and American exports; the death rattle of the U.S.
auto industry; the plunge of stock markets everywhere; the sickening
rise in global joblessness; and the growing shakiness of governments in
fledgling democracies that opened themselves to the world market -
judging by all these, a more social capitalism is on the horizon because
the deregulated capitalism of the past 30 years has blown itself up,
taking much of the known world with it.

So, for conservatives searching for the culprits behind this
transformation of capitalism: Despite our best efforts, it wasn't Bernie
and it wasn't me. It was your own damn system.




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"WebTV Dawgs/Dittos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/WebTV-Pals
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to