Sadly, neither Widener Law School students nor Chris Coons can read documents as written, not even the US Constitution * * O’Donnell brighter than Coons, Widener law school students
- October 19th, 2010 4:20 pm MT - By James Russell Bailey <http://www.examiner.com/user-thermop57>, Casper Public Policy Examiner *Casper, Wyoming* residents studied and have actually read the *Constitution of the United States*, something which *Christine O’Donnell* has obviously done, but which her opponent, *Chris Coons* has not, even though he is a lawyer. During a debate at the *University of Delaware*, O’Donnell asked a simple question of Coons: “She interrupted to say, "The First Amendment does? ... So you're telling me that the separation of church and state, the phrase 'separation of church and state,' is in the First Amendment?" <http://yhoo.it/aKdd48> *Coons *maintained that the ‘*concept*’ was ‘*settled law*’ and tried to shift the debate to another subject, while the audience in fit of *Coonian *ignorance continued to snicker at *O’Donnell’s* point: that in fact, the phrase ‘*separation of church and state*’ does *not *exist anywhere in the *US Constitution*. What does the *First Amendment* say in reference to religion? “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…” <http://bit.ly/cdTDNG> It is not surprising that a room full of aspiring lawyers, professional theorists with little to no interaction with the real world outside a courtroom or law library, should gasp at someone pointing out a false prejudicial dogma put forth by *Social Progressive* law schools, jurists, law professors, and professional politicians. Law students at such *SP *universities like Widener are rather like lemmings, furry brown little creatures, which every *7 *years fling themselves over cliffs and into the water of the ocean below, in an avalanche of genocidal ferocity; not knowing why they do what they do, but despite that lack of real world knowledge, they do it anyway. The constitutional fact remains that the* First Amendment* states that *Congress *shall make no laws establishing religion. This means that *Congress *and by extension of both logic and *US *political structure, state congresses, can not make laws compelling people to worship in a certain way. *Casper *residents reject *SP *false dogmas stating a Valedictorian can’t say a prayer or cite religious passages at graduation ceremonies. The student is exercising freedom of religion and speech. Sadly, neither *Widener *law students nor *Chris Coons* understands this obvious concept. *O’Donnell *is trying to wake voters up to constitutional facts and take back their country from *Social Progressive* dogmatists who despise people of biblical/tanach faith and the *Constitution *which guarantees the rights of speech and religon. http://www.examiner.com/public-policy-in-casper/o-donnell-brighter-than-coons-widener-law-school-students On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, DUG Nunya-Bidness <[email protected]> wrote: > POL-:-Christine O'Donnell doesn't know where separation of chuch and state > comes from-! > > Help Teach Christine O'Donnell the First Amendment > > Hear in her own words: > > http://tinyurl.com/2cum3vl > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "WebTV Dawgs/Dittos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<webtv-pals%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/webtv-pals?hl=en. > -- ~~~~~~~~~ ~~ J O N ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WebTV Dawgs/Dittos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webtv-pals?hl=en.
