On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 10:57:30AM -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> At 07:19 AM 5/29/01 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> >At 03:05 AM 5/29/2001 +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> >>AsyncThreadedAppServer (5.1-rc3) crashes with
> >[snip]
> >>ThreadedAppServer seems to work ok..
> >
> >Seems like Async:
> > - has problems in general
> > - is often slower than plain Threaded
> > - adds more code and complexity and maintenance
> > - adds more moving parts
> >
> >My current impression is that we should axe it.
> >
> >Opinions?
>
> Unfortunately, the standalone server, AsyncThreadedHTTPServer, uses
> AsyncThreadedAppServer. So we really shouldn't axe Async until someone
> takes the time to write a ThreadedHTTPServer.
But AsyncThreadedHTTPServer is also "experimental" and has its own
problems. (Remember how it timed out whenever I tried to log in to a
protected page?) So why not just give AsyncThreadedAppServer the
same status? Then just change the AppServer shell script to launch
ThreadedAppServer instead of AsyncThreadedAppServer.
--
-Mike (Iron) Orr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if mail problems: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://iron.cx/ English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
