On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:11, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > Well, for what it's worth, I prefer ; > I think ;# looks awkward at best and confusing at worst. I agree with you about that. It's just a pain in the ass to switch to a single char closure - i.e. create a parser that would be able to handle all the different types of directives in addition to $placeholders. Adding a new directive is currently a 5-10 minute process. I suspect it would be much more difficult to add new directives to a parser. For the amount of use the explicit closures are going to see it's just not worth the effort. _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Mike Orr
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tom Schwaller
- Re: [Webware-devel] # in Templates Tavis Rudd
