Geoff Talvola wrote: > > I also argued that we'd be better off storing the threads on a stack > instead of a queue. That way the most recently used threads get > reused, which may produce slightly better performance. I wonder if > there's a thread-safe Stack class analogous to the Queue class that > comes with Python? We don't store the threads or select which one runs. They all contend for a Queue and whichever one gets it gets it. Jay _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Jay Love
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Geoff Talvola
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Geoff Talvola
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Baruch Even
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Mike Orr
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Geoff Talvola
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Jay Love
- Re: [Webware-devel] cvs updates: Dynamic Number of Thread Geoff Talvola
