At 09:55 AM 6/8/2001 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>Perhaps better would be to port dtml-in's batching capability. This would
>probably be a large project, however. #for would need keywords for the batch
>size and where to start. Then $foo.sequenceNumber() would be the relative
>index from the start of the page (1-based), etc. We'd also need to support
>"previous" and "next" pseudo-batches for people's navigation
>links (or maybe not: $foo.previousSequenceStartNumber() etc. may overlap
>it).
>
>Supporting something comparable to dtml-in would be a major feature.
>Someday I've been meaning to look at dtml-in's source and see if it's
>self-contained enough to leverage.
Perhaps it would make sense to separate #for from #batch, which still
providing additional power to #for.
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
