[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Orr) wrote:
> I don't think he meant the speed of the adapter per se, but rather the
> overall impact of using Tux instead of Apache. Tux is supposed to be
> faster and resource-lighter for static files, which could make a
> difference on high-traffic sites.
Sorry, I didn't mean the adapter entirely, but rather the time spent
not inside the AppServer -- i.e., web server, adapter, passing
information on the socket.
Tux-like optimizations of short cutting certain parts of that process
might do something -- like having the web server forward requests to
Webware, instead of talking with the AppServer and then passing the
response on. But even then I don't know if there's a lot of time to
be saved there.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
