That sounds reasonable to me. The challenge will to make sure we follow through when cutting releases.
-Chuck On Friday 13 December 2002 06:26 pm, Stuart Donaldson wrote: > I have noticed a couple of places where New and Old are used to > identify improved and out-dated methodologies. > > NewThreadedAppServer, serverSideInfoForRequestNew and > filenamesForBaseNameNew > > Is the plan to remove (at least the New*) names prior to the next > release? If not, I would encourage it. Because if NewFunction > starts getting used in production and needs to be supported, then at > some point it fails to be New and you want to come up with another > one. > > I think it would be a good idea to say that using New* (where New > indicates a new/experimental methodology) should be "unsupported" in > the sense that once the New approach has been adopted, the name will > be changed back to the standard name. > > Thoughts? > > -Stuart- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
