On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:24:53 -0700 Kyle VanderBeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm evaluating WebWare for possible uses at my company. However, I'm > distressed by how heavyweight and html-specific WebKit.Page is. I think > it is bothersome, a little confusing, and not very graceful when it > comes to wanting to write a webapp that extends the toolkit. I hear you, but what you might want to do is write a new class extending HTTPServlet or extend Page and override _respond: I'm generating pages using webware with SimpleTal( generating xml) -> xslt -> html by overriding Page _respond method (it was the easy way ;-) ) -- Delio PS what webware is missing IMHO is a way to cleanly set the session class to use and a way to customise the url to servlet mapping policy ( unless I couldn't find them when I looked at the code) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
